Annie Hall (@nnie H@ll)

by Logan Gion

Why is the title “@nnie H@ll” instead of just “Annie Hall“?

As of this writing, the WGA strike is set to enter its 22nd week. During this time, much has been made of artificial intelligence and its capabilities. I have seen takes from major publications that sound either inane or alarmist. Curious, I familiarized myself with ChatGPT 3.5, feeding it dozens of my reviews and posts. Once I felt ready, I asked ChatGPT to write a review for The Red Shoes. The results were hilariously bad.

Ready to write off the whole technology as bogus, I told my screenplay co-writer what happened. He cautioned my glib attitude, explained that ChatGPT worked better in smaller doses, and encouraged me to try again–this time, section by section. By this time, The Red Shoes review had already been posted, and I’d drafted most of my Annie Hall review. Thus, I bore the below experiment: I write my version of Annie Hall, then display ChatGPT’s version beside it.

As you’ll see, the results hit close to home in some areas, but less so in others. This exercise has taught me that, like money, AI tools are not inherently evil. They’re just tools. The people that want to wield AI unilaterally without distinction, however, are on the wrong side of the WGA/SAG strike.

Separately, I’ve thoroughly tested the layout for this post, but I imagine some readers will get gobbledegook. Let me know if there are problems; I’ll do my best to fix them!

Advertisement
September on the Stage
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Where can I watch Annie Hall?

Conclusion

ChatGPT is a powerful tool–one which I’ll be using in the future. Looking up the detailed information for “The Basics” section takes time to get right. ChatGPT does it near instantly. I may also use it as a base for the “Why is [blank] considered obligatory?” section, as ChatGPT can collate historical praise from vast corners of the Internet faster than I can. Another way ChatGPT has already helped me is by writing SEO-friendly meta-descriptions. These 20-word previews, different from those I post on Facebook or in the “More you might enjoy” section, help new people find this blog and help Google place my reviews higher on their pages. All these ways and more mean that ChatGPT, at least partially, showed its value in this contest.

Conversely, I found its version of my content sections bland. Though it has the occasional hit (I actually smiled at its final “Who’s the audience” bullet point), ChatGPT’s overall writing style becomes as taupe as the color of this very font! Rest assured that I’ve not been fully replaced yet.

Finally, and most concerning, ChatGPT’s writing is never bad, always at least competent. Such consistency is desirable in creative industries known where risk is inherent with every project. Many a discussion about “the sameness of Marvel movies” contains a comment that validly points out the level of quality assurance present in the MCU. While Marvel has only a few truly great films in their repertoire, they only have a couple stinkers (Thor: The Dark World is no one’s career high…). The rest sit slightly above average. I understand ChatGPT’s appeal to studio executives. To take a creative endeavor, however, and minimize its creativity is a foundational corruption of the process–one that threatens to rot cinema. Why? Because if I can tell what ChatGPT sounds like after reading five or so samples of its work, moviegoers will learn to spot it  quickly as well–and no one goes to the paint store excited to buy taupe.

You know what else is "must-see"?

Oblogatory's Newsletter!

Subscribe for the Latest in Entertainment, Reviews, and More!

You'll get a confirmation email once you submit the form. After that, the newsletter is sent once weekly. Read our privacy policy for more info.

More you might enjoy:

Or choose your own adventure!

Oblogatory Archives

Leave a Reply

Upcoming Oblogatory: Classic Movie Reviews Schedule

Note: Beginning in late March, I began a transformative yet energy-draining health procedure. I've had to take unexpected breaks from posting, so, unfortunately, I can't always get to everything I have planned. I'll do my best to keep it as accurate as possible.

November 6th

The 400 Blows: Leftover from both January and April’s themes

November 13th

The Umbrellas of Cherbourg: Leftover from April and September’s themes

November 20th

Blow Out: Leftover from August’s theme

November 22nd

Why are PG Rated Movies from the ’70s and ’80s So Graphic? A “Why Does Hollywood?” Post/Oblogatory Deep Dive

Likely Posts

Why Aren’t There More Family Sitcoms Nowadays? A “Why Does Hollywood?” Post

Adventure Time: Partially Obligatory

Why do European movies look different than American ones? A “Why Does Hollywood?” Post

Obligatory Animated Viewing from 2023

Likely Posts

Obligatory Live-Action Viewing from 2023

Rocky: Yo, Adrian!

Midnight Cowboy: Hey, I’m Walkin’ Here!

Road House: Pain Don’t Hurt…

The Big Sleep: “You’re Cute.” “Gettin’ Cuter Every Minute.”

Advertisement

Currently Oblogatory

Movies

Television

Animation

Blue Eye Samurai
From the writer of "Logan" and "Blade Runner 2049," "Blue Eye Samurai" follows a mixed-race swordsman in 1600s Japan who, ordered by the shogunate, must expel Europeans that've remained in the country illegally. Rotten Tomatoes puts it at 100%.
Pluto
Netflix releases the 8-part, hour-long-episode event about Gesicht, a detective investigating a string of human and android murders. The culprit could be a robot, which would mark only the second time in history that such a thing has occurred. From the mastermind who made ‘Monster,” this grim mystery is a spinoff—believe it or not—of “Astro Boy”!
Previous slide
Next slide

Share this:

Like this:

%d bloggers like this: